<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, it&#8217;s funny; you can laugh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leahodonovan.com/2008/09/11/yes-its-funny-you-can-laugh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leahodonovan.com/2008/09/11/yes-its-funny-you-can-laugh/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.leahodonovan.com/2008/09/11/yes-its-funny-you-can-laugh/comment-page-1/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leahodonovan.com/2008/09/11/yes-its-funny-you-can-laugh/#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>The Republicans were the first to express &#039;outrage&#039; but then, yes, as usual the media took it and ran with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republicans were the first to express &#8216;outrage&#8217; but then, yes, as usual the media took it and ran with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.leahodonovan.com/2008/09/11/yes-its-funny-you-can-laugh/comment-page-1/#comment-2125</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leahodonovan.com/2008/09/11/yes-its-funny-you-can-laugh/#comment-2125</guid>
		<description>I like it.

I dislike the fact that a tortured metaphor has been twisted and pulled into an unrecognisable mess by idiots.

Was Obama talking about Palin when he did the whole &quot;lipstick&quot; thing?

No.

Has the media selectively edited his comments to turn this into a much bigger story?

You fucking bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.</p>
<p>I dislike the fact that a tortured metaphor has been twisted and pulled into an unrecognisable mess by idiots.</p>
<p>Was Obama talking about Palin when he did the whole &#8220;lipstick&#8221; thing?</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>Has the media selectively edited his comments to turn this into a much bigger story?</p>
<p>You fucking bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

