It’s been a while
I haven’t heard about (or sought out information on) Peta in a while nor veggie-fascists. I unfortunately came across this commentary on Guardian today from my ‘favourite’ atheist-bus-campaigner. Setting aside her whole ‘there’s probably no God’ malarkey it was a good article. I was intrigued by this sentence: “Despite the best efforts of Finding Nemo, A Shark Tale and the Peta marketing team who brought you “sea kittens” ”
Basically good old Peta have got their proverbial knickers in a twist about fishing. It’s probably been going on for some time seeing as their ultimate goal is the liberation of all animals. They are campaigning to outlaw fishing and are doing so by equating fish with their new term ’sea kittens’. The logic seems to be ‘you wouldn’t hurt a kitten, why hurt a fish?’
I would expect Peta to campaign against fishing; they are, after all an animal rights group. I suppose what made my blood boil the most was the inane nature of this campaign. Calling a fish a ’sea kitten’ does not make me any less likely to pluck it from the water, bash it on the head, fry it up and eat it; or stick it on some vinegared rice with a side of wasabi and soy sauce. As Shakespeare so eloquently put it (thank you complete works of Shakespeare iPhone application): “that which we call a rose by any other word would smell as sweet.” That which we call a ’sea kitten’ smells just as fishy and tastes just as good.
And finally, if you go to the Peta website, please visit the Create Your Own Sea Kitten section. Someone out there explain to me why, under the Accessories tab, there are floaties? Fish swim; why the hell do they need arm flotation devices?! I can’t figure out if this campaign ’game’ is actually aimed at children or animal rights activists really have that low of an IQ.
